[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

* David Howells <> wrote:

> (3) Some people want mutexes to be:
> (a) only releasable in the same context as they were taken
> (b) not accessible in interrupt context, or that (a) applies here also
> (c) not initialisable to the locked state
> But this means that the current usages all have to be carefully audited,
> and sometimes that unobvious.

(a) and (c) is not a big problem, are they are essentially the
constraints of -rt mutexes. As long as there's good debugging code, it's
very much doable. We dont want to change semantics _yet again_, later
down the line.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-14 09:35    [W:0.158 / U:23.952 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site