[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:01:26AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andi Kleen <> wrote:
> >
> > Can you please apply the following patch then?
> >
> > Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> OK.
> Thus far I have this:

Would it be possible to drop support for gcc 3.0 too?
AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the
advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make
the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-13 10:08    [W:0.194 / U:2.764 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site