lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] sanitize building of fs/compat_ioctl.c
> I suppose.  We could also funnel down ->compat_{read,write}() and
> so on down the call chain, but that would likely be even uglier.

The problem is that this would need to be done for all variants
(write, writev, aio_write, send{,msg,to} etc.) Same for read. I probably forgot
one or two.


> I guess with is_compat_task() we can do the netlink and pfkeyv2 compat
> stuff on ia64/x86_64. I don't look forward to reviewing a patch
> implementing that, however :-/

And iptables, although that would be probably *really* ugly.
It's a bit of a sore spot on x86-64 though. 64bit kernel with full
32bit userland works usually great except for iptables and ipsec.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-14 03:43    [W:0.082 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site