Messages in this thread | | | From | Nikita Danilov <> | Date | Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:21:10 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation |
| |
Alan Cox writes: > Actually a PS to this while I think about it. spin_locks and mutex type > locks could both do with a macro for > > call_locked(&lock, foo(a,b,c,d))
reiser4 code was publicly humiliated for such macros, but indeed they are useful. The only problem is that one needs two macros: one for foo() returning void and one for all other cases.
> > to cut down on all the error path forgot to release a lock type errors. >
Nikita. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |