lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 08:35 -0600, Christopher Friesen wrote:

>>In this case, introducing a new API means the changes can be made over time.
>
>
> in this case, doing this change gradual I think is a mistake. We should
> do all of the in-kernel code at least...

This means verifying all the users before patch submission, which may be
problematic.

I guess the point I'm trying to make is that if you create a new API you
have the option of converting the obvious cases first, which should
cover the majority of users. Anywhere the behaviour is non-obvious can
be left using the old API, and the out-of-tree users will continue to
work correctly.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-13 16:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans