[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
    On Maw, 2005-12-13 at 13:32 +0000, David Howells wrote:
    > > Its then obvious what it does, you don't randomly break other drivers you've
    > > not reviewed and the interface is intuitive rather than obfuscated.
    > I've attempted to review everything in 2.6.15-rc5 outside of most of the archs.
    > I can't easily modify any driver not contained in that tarball, but at least
    > the compiler will barf and force a review.

    Is there a reason you didnt answer the comment about down/up being the
    usual way computing refers to the operations on counting semaphores but
    just deleted it ?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-13 15:02    [W:0.021 / U:29.792 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site