[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
On Maw, 2005-12-13 at 13:32 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Its then obvious what it does, you don't randomly break other drivers you've
> > not reviewed and the interface is intuitive rather than obfuscated.
> I've attempted to review everything in 2.6.15-rc5 outside of most of the archs.
> I can't easily modify any driver not contained in that tarball, but at least
> the compiler will barf and force a review.

Is there a reason you didnt answer the comment about down/up being the
usual way computing refers to the operations on counting semaphores but
just deleted it ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-13 15:02    [W:0.179 / U:0.696 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site