[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
On Maw, 2005-12-13 at 13:47 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > spinlock to do the cmpxchg. This means that there wont be one single
> > global spinlock to emulate cmpxchg, but the mutex's own spinlock can be
> > used for it.
> Can't you use the pointer as a hash input?

Some platforms already do this for certain sets of operations like
atomic_t. The downside however is that you no longer control the lock
contention or cache line bouncing. It becomes a question of luck rather
than science as to how well it scales.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-13 14:12    [W:0.157 / U:0.860 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site