[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

* David Howells <> wrote:

> Nick Piggin <> wrote:
> > We have atomic_cmpxchg. Can you use that for a sufficient generic
> > implementation?
> No. CMPXCHG/CAS is not as available as XCHG, and it's also unnecessary.

take a look at the PREEMPT_RT implementation of mutexes: it uses
cmpxchg(), and thus both the down() and the up() fastpath is lockless!
(And that is a mutex type that does alot more things, as it supports
priority inheritance.)

architectures which dont have cmpxchg can use a spinlock just fine.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-13 11:16    [W:0.214 / U:1.056 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site