Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] alpha build pm_power_off hack | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:23:12 -0700 |
| |
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> writes:
> This follows up Eric W. Biederman's patch of Dec 8, 2005: > [PATCH] Don't attempt to power off if power off is not implemented. > > To avoid having problems with one arch break the crosstool > builds which developers for other arch's do to ensure they > haven't added an arch-specific build bug, add a NULL > pm_power_off() function pointer definition to the alpha build. > > Without this change, an alpha build fails in the final link > stage, for the missing 'pm_power_off' symbol that is used > in kernel/sys.c > > If the alpha developers don't like the behaviour of '/sbin/halt' > on their kernel, I will leave that to them to figure out.
Taking a quick glance at alpha causes me to think we always want pm_power_off to be non null on alpha.
Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |