Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:09:43 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Fix bytecount result from printk() |
| |
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Mark Lord wrote: > > On a related note, WHY does the LOG LEVEL format <6> not get > interpreted correctly for the first printk() after an oops report?
It never gets interpreted except at the behinning of a line. Sounds like the oops report perhaps prints a " " without a newline or something at the end, so that the next message after that isn't a new line?
Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |