[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It does everything we want.

I don't think so: the union leaves us just as vulnerable to some
subsystem using fields of the other half of the union, doesn't it?

Which is not really a problem, but is a part of what's worrying you.

> Of course, it would be nice to retain 2.95.x support. The reviled
> page_private(() would help us do that. But the now-to-be-reviled
> page_mapping() does extraneous stuff, and we'd need a ton of page_lru()'s.
> So it'd be a big patch, converting page->lru to page->u.s.lru in lots of
> places.
> But I think either a big patch or 2.95.x abandonment is preferable to this
> approach.

Hmm, that's a pity.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-10 03:26    [W:0.076 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site