[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: typedefs and structs
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 19:59, Douglas McNaught wrote:
> linas <> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:37:20PM -0500, Douglas McNaught was heard to remark:
> >>
> >> Yeah, but if you're trying to read that code, you have to go look up
> >> the declaration to figure out whether it might affect 'foo' or not.
> >> And if you get it wrong, you get silent data corruption.
> >
> > No, that is not what "pass by reference" means. You are thinking of
> > "const", maybe, or "pass by value"; this is neither. The arg is not
> > declared const, the subroutine can (and usually will) modify the contents
> > of the structure, and so the caller will be holding a modified structure
> > when the callee returns (just like it would if a pointer was passed).
> Right. My point is only that it's not clear from looking at the call
> site whether a struct passed by reference will be modified by the
> callee (some people pass by reference just for "efficiency"). And if
> the called function modifies the data without the caller's knowledge,
> it leads to obscure bugs. Whereas if you pass a pointer, it's
> immediately clear that the called function can modify the pointed-to
> object.

A structure is almost never passed by value, no matter whether it is C
or C++. So both languages require you either use descriptive naming or
look up declaration/implementation:

struct str {
char buf[1024];
int count;
struct str s;


Which one modufies s?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-09 03:17    [W:0.120 / U:2.328 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site