lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] Memory Add Fixes for ppc64
From
Date

> Just curious if we still want to boost MAX_ORDER like this with 64k
> pages? Doesn't that make the MAX_ORDER block size 256MB in this case?
> Also, not quite sure what happens if memory size (a 16 MB multiple)
> does not align with a MAX_ORDER block size (a 256MB multiple in this
> case). My 'guess' is that the page allocator would not use it as it
> would not fit within the buddy system.
>
> cc'ing SPARSEMEM author Andy Whitcroft.

Yes, the MAX_ORDER should be different indeed. But can Kconfig do that ?
That is have the default value be different based on a Kconfig option ?
I don't see that ... We may have to do things differently here...

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-07 22:16    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans