Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo | Date | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:34:19 -0800 | From | "Dugger, Donald D" <> |
| |
Andi-
Good guess. We discuessed it and decided that `vmx' was the best term so I'll rework the patch to use that name.
BTW, I don't see any reference to `vmx' in the 2.6.14 tree, is this a change you recently made to your tree?
-- Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale Donald.D.Dugger@intel.com Ph: (303)440-1368
>-----Original Message----- >From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org >[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Andi Kleen >Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 6:53 PM >To: Dugger, Donald D >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Shah, Rajesh; akpm@osdl.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add VT flag to cpuinfo > >donald.d.dugger@intel.com (Donald D Dugger) writes: > >> Andrew- >> >> Attached is a trivial patch to 2.6 that will add `vt' to the >flags field >> of `/proc/cpuinfo' for CPUs that have Intel's virtualization >technology. > >The x86-64 tree already has "vmx" for it. What is the correct >name? > >-Andi >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |