[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectFirst steps towards making NO_IRQ a generic concept

Hi Linus,

This series of four patches are the first step towards making NO_IRQ a
pervasive concept. It's bundled up in a git tree for your convenience
(unless I bodged it up, in which case it's your inconvenience).

git:// no_irq

- Check the irq number is within bounds in the functions which weren't
already checking.
- Introduce PCI_NO_IRQ and pci_valid_irq()
Explicitly initialise pci_dev->irq with PCI_NO_IRQ, allowing us to change
the value of PCI_NO_IRQ when all drivers have been audited.
- Use pci_valid_irq() instead of a custom NO_IRQ definition.
It probably didn't work on half a dozen architectures.
- Move the definition of NO_IRQ from asm directories to <linux/hardirq.h>.
Individual architectures can still override it if they want to, but all
existing definitions were -1.

drivers/pci/probe.c | 7 +++++--
drivers/pcmcia/pd6729.c | 6 +-----
include/asm-arm/irq.h | 8 --------
include/asm-arm26/irq.h | 8 --------
include/asm-frv/irq.h | 3 ---
include/asm-parisc/irq.h | 2 --
include/asm-powerpc/irq.h | 3 ---
include/linux/hardirq.h | 10 ++++++++++
include/linux/pci.h | 9 +++++++++
kernel/irq/manage.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
10 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

I'll follow this mail with the patches for other peoples benefits. They
were previously posted to linux-arch with no responses.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-03 15:52    [W:0.057 / U:0.696 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site