[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 12/12: eCryptfs] Crypto functions
    On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 16:25 -0600, Michael Thompson wrote:
    > On 11/3/05, Dave Kleikamp <> wrote:
    > > On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 20:56 -0700, Phillip Hellewell wrote:
    > > > + ecryptfs_fput(lower_file);
    > >
    > > Why the call to ecryptfs_fput() here? The caller does it's own fput on
    > > lower_file.
    > Hmm, good catch. That slipped through us - and to be hoenst, I have no
    > explination other than, it's wrong. ecryptfs_write_headers should not
    > be responsible for put'ing that which it did not get.
    > I'm wondering if I should be sending 1 patch per tiny fix like this,
    > or if I should be waiting for a few more changes, so as to not flood
    > the threads with minor patches?

    Well, I found it trying to look for the cause of bug 1228303, but I
    haven't actually run anything to verify it. It may be worth checking if
    it fixes that problem, and if it does, it would bump up its importance.

    > Thanks,
    > Mike
    David Kleikamp
    IBM Linux Technology Center

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-03 23:32    [W:0.021 / U:20.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site