lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/7] fuse: support caching negative dentries
From
Date
> >
> > +void fuse_invalidate_attr(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > + get_fuse_inode(inode)->i_time = jiffies - 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void fuse_invalidate_entry_cache(struct dentry *entry)
> > +{
> > + entry->d_time = jiffies - 1;
> > +}
> > +
>
> I'd normally have a little whine about lack of comments here - pity the
> poor programmer who is trying to work out why on earth that code is doing
> that.

Well, I thought it was evident, but it seems not. I'll add some
comments.

> But fuse is pretty much a comment-free zone anyway.

I think most of FUSE is really-really obvious. The most complex parts
are in the device handling, which is now quite well commented (thanks
to your earlier whining :).

> Please don't go near any buses.

Don't worry, I usually go by tram.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-28 22:09    [W:0.037 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site