Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 7/7] fuse: support caching negative dentries | From | Miklos Szeredi <> | Date | Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:06:52 +0100 |
| |
> > > > +void fuse_invalidate_attr(struct inode *inode) > > +{ > > + get_fuse_inode(inode)->i_time = jiffies - 1; > > +} > > + > > +static void fuse_invalidate_entry_cache(struct dentry *entry) > > +{ > > + entry->d_time = jiffies - 1; > > +} > > + > > I'd normally have a little whine about lack of comments here - pity the > poor programmer who is trying to work out why on earth that code is doing > that.
Well, I thought it was evident, but it seems not. I'll add some comments.
> But fuse is pretty much a comment-free zone anyway.
I think most of FUSE is really-really obvious. The most complex parts are in the device handling, which is now quite well commented (thanks to your earlier whining :).
> Please don't go near any buses.
Don't worry, I usually go by tram.
Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |