[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] ioat: DMA engine support
    Andi Kleen wrote:
    > Longer term the right way to handle this would be likely to use
    > POSIX AIO on sockets. With that interface it would be easier
    > to keep long queues of data in flight, which would be best for
    > the DMA engine.


    For my own userland projects, I'm starting to feel the need for network
    AIO, since it is more natural: the hardware operations themselves are

    >>In addition to helping speed up network RX, I would like to see how
    >>possible it is to experiment with IOAT uses outside of networking.
    >>Sample ideas: VM page pre-zeroing. ATA PIO data xfers (async copy to
    >>static buffer, to dramatically shorten length of kmap+irqsave time).
    >>Extremely large memcpy() calls.
    > Another proposal was swiotlb.

    That's an interesting thought.

    > But it's not clear it's a good idea: a lot of these applications prefer to
    > have the target in cache. And IOAT will force it out of cache.
    >>Additionally, current IOAT is memory->memory. I would love to be able
    >>to convince Intel to add transforms and checksums, to enable offload of
    >>memory->transform->memory and memory->checksum->result operations like
    >>sha-{1,256} hashing[1], crc32*, aes crypto, and other highly common
    >>operations. All of that could be made async.
    > I remember the registers in the Amiga Blitter for this and I'm
    > still scared... Maybe it's better to keep it simple.

    We're talking about CISC here! ;-) ;-)

    [note: I'm the type of person who would stuff the kernel + glibc onto an
    FPGA, if I could]

    I would love to see Intel, AMD, VIA (others?) compete by adding selected
    transforms/checksums/hashs to their chips, though this method. Just
    provide a method to enumerate what transforms are supported on <this>


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-24 00:05    [W:0.022 / U:1.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site