[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:03:12AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In short: NO_IRQ _is_ 0. Always has been. It's the only sane value. And
> btw, there is no need for that #define at all, exactly because the way you
> test for "is this no irq" is by doing "!dev->irq".

Could you at least take the first patch that checks that we don't go
outside the bounds of the irq_desc array?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-22 19:23    [W:0.099 / U:27.136 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site