[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CIFS improvements/wider testing needed
Steve French wrote:
>> Steve French wrote:
>>> Eric,
>> Well I would be surprised the "cat >> titi" command does any of this
>> byte range lock. If the "create and later rewrite the same file"
>> sequence fails, with a simple cat command (cat > titi ... ^D; cat >>
>> titi), how can it works with complicated applications?
> Make sure that you let me know if your cat example works when mounted
> with the relatively new "noperm" mount option on the client. At least
> then we will know whether we are looking at a problem with access
> control on the server (ntfs acls) or client (unix mode bits and the
> .permission entry point)

Works with the "noperm" mount option.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-22 14:59    [W:0.105 / U:1.320 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site