[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CIFS improvements/wider testing needed

>Steve French wrote:
>Well I would be surprised the "cat >> titi" command does any of this
>byte range lock. If the "create and later rewrite the same file"
>sequence fails, with a simple cat command (cat > titi ... ^D; cat >>
>titi), how can it works with complicated applications?
Make sure that you let me know if your cat example works when mounted
with the relatively new "noperm" mount option on the client. At least
then we will know whether we are looking at a problem with access
control on the server (ntfs acls) or client (unix mode bits and the
.permission entry point)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-21 22:33    [W:0.067 / U:0.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site