Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:57:59 +0900 | From | Magnus Damm <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/05] NUMA: Generic code |
| |
On 16 Nov 2005 08:48:39 +0100, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: > Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> writes: > > > > For testing, your NUMA emulation code is perfect IMO. But for memory > > resource control your NUMA emulation code may be too simple. > > > > With my patch, CONFIG_NUMA_EMU provides a way to partition a machine > > into several smaller nodes, regardless if the machine is using NUMA or > > not. > > > > This NUMA emulation code together with CPUSETS could be seen as a > > simple alternative to the memory resource control provided by CKRM. > > I believe Werner tried to use it at some point for that and it just > didn't work very well. So it doesn't seem to be very useful for > that usecase.
Sorry, but which one did not work very well? CKRM memory controller or NUMA emulation + CPUSETS?
Thanks,
/ magnus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |