[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/10] Cr4 is valid on some 486s
    Gerd Knorr wrote:

    >> Yep, extending alternatives is probably better than duplicating the
    >> code. Maybe having some alternative_smp() macro which places both
    >> code versions into the .altinstr_replacement table? If that sounds
    >> ok I'll try to come up with a experimental patch.
    > i.e. something like this (as basic idea, patch is far away from doing
    > anything useful ...)?

    You still need to preserve the originals so that you can patch in both
    directions. In the dynamic scenario, you need a multi-way set of
    alternatives, with the most conservative of those compiled in inline.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-15 17:06    [W:0.020 / U:25.924 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site