Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: truncate_inode_pages_range patch to mainline ? | From | Badari Pulavarty <> | Date | Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:10:43 -0800 |
| |
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 11:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > I would like to find out, what your plans and/or concerns > > to push > > > > reiser4-truncate_inode_pages_range.patch > > > > from your -mm tree to mainline ? > > Well that's part of the reiser4 patch series. It can be fed forward if we > need it, of course.
Please do - if you don't have concerns with it.
> > > I need this for my madvise(REMOVE) work. > > That's OK. > > > And also, I see that > > madvise(REMOVE) is not in -mm2 also. Do you still > > have concerns with it ? > > I haven't looked much at the latest version yet, sorry. The > two-weeks-after-release window isn't a good time to be looking at new > features, so there's quite a lot of material saved up for the > six-week-interregnum.
There is no changes in the last version, except 1 page changelog to include the discussions & future plans.
I am okay, as long as I am in the queue for next release. I was hoping to get more testing in your -mm tree, in the meanwhile.
> > But yes, your patch still sucks ;)
I know :)
Any suggestion on making it less sucky ? I really need this :(
Thanks, Badari
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |