[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/15] mm: atomic64 page counts
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:

> I've nothing against zero page refcounting avoidance, just wanted
> numbers to show it's more worth doing than not doing. And I'm not
> the only one to have wondered, if it is an issue, wouldn't big NUMA
> benefit more from per-node zero pages anyway? (Though of course
> the pages themselves should stay clean, so won't be bouncing.)

Per-node zero pages sound good. The page structs are placed on the
respective nodes and therefore would not bounce.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-11-11 19:06    [W:0.097 / U:8.932 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site