[lkml]   [2005]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/15] mm: atomic64 page counts
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:

    > I've nothing against zero page refcounting avoidance, just wanted
    > numbers to show it's more worth doing than not doing. And I'm not
    > the only one to have wondered, if it is an issue, wouldn't big NUMA
    > benefit more from per-node zero pages anyway? (Though of course
    > the pages themselves should stay clean, so won't be bouncing.)

    Per-node zero pages sound good. The page structs are placed on the
    respective nodes and therefore would not bounce.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-11-11 19:06    [W:0.025 / U:2.716 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site