Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:52:56 +0000 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/15] mm: poison struct page for ptlock |
| |
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:37:19PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > spinlock in struct page, and the size of the spinlock varies a lot according > > to config. The only >wordsize version we really care about is > > CONFIG_PREEMPT, NR_CPUS >= 4. (which distros don't ship...) > > Suse, Debian and Redhat ship such kernels.
No. SuSE and Redhat have always been smart enough to avoid CONFIG_PREEMPT like the plague, and even Debian finally noticed this a few month ago.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |