Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:20:57 +0800 | From | Coywolf Qi Hunt <> | Subject | Re: [Security] "stable" vs "security stable" |
| |
On 10/9/05, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> wrote: > * Coywolf Qi Hunt (coywolf@gmail.com) wrote: > > I find the kernel.org first page inconvenient for some people somehow > > since the security stable came. > > It's stable, not security stable. It does contain security fixes > sometimes, but it is generally about patches that improve kernel > stability.
OK, "stable" vs "base" now. 2.6.13.3 is the latest stable, and 2.6.13 is the latest base.
> > > Now on the kernel.org page, we have 2.6.13.3 and 2.6.14-rc3. If one > > wants to get 2.6.14-rc3, he shouldn't get 2.6.14-rc3 Full, but > > 2.6.14-rc3 Patch and 2.6.13 Full, which isn't there unfortunately. I > > suggest we name 2.6.13.3 "security stable", and 2.6.13 "stable". > > Perhaps a column B for base. Or just link to ketchup and be done with it. >
-- Coywolf Qi Hunt http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |