[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] atomic create+open
> As I believe I said earlier, open by inode number/filehandle/... don't
> exist in the NFSv4 protocol due to the potential for races.

I must have missed this.

Yes, open(O_CREAT) has race problems. Plain open() doesn't. So I
still don't see why you want to use the open-by-name for the
non-create case.

> No. There is no race for setattr() etc since they only do one lookup
> (and they don't set up any state on the server).
> open() is the only case where we currently have to look things up twice
> (and I remind you that the second "lookup" is in fact the OPEN
> operation).

If NFS cannot do open by filehandle, then ->open_create() interface is
not enough obviously.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-07 19:24    [W:0.052 / U:4.580 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site