Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Oct 2005 17:57:03 +0100 (IST) | From | Mel Gorman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V16: 003_fragcore |
| |
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 15:46 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > @@ -1483,8 +1540,10 @@ void show_free_areas(void) > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); > > for (order = 0; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) { > > - nr = zone->free_area[order].nr_free; > > - total += nr << order; > > + for (type=0; type < RCLM_TYPES; type++) { > > + nr = zone->free_area_lists[type][order].nr_free; > > + total += nr << order; > > + } > > Can that use the new for_each_ macro? >
Yes, yes it can. Not sure why I dismissed it the first time around.
-- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Java Applications Developer University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |