Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:44:52 +0100 | From | Simon Richter <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/isdn/: "extern inline" -> "static inline" |
| |
Hi,
Adrian Bunk schrieb:
> "extern inline" doesn't make much sense.
In fact, it does[1], but not in this particular case.
Simon
[1] "if this function is not inlined, treat it as extern instead of creating a copy in this TU". [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |