[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: select() for delay.
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 20:06 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Maandag 24 Oktober 2005 12:55, wrote:
> > This is regarding select() system call.
> >
> > Linux select() man page mentions " Some code calls select with all
> > three sets empty, n zero, and a non-null timeout as a fairly portable
> > way to sleep with subsecond precision".
> When you make a change to a system call, you should always check
> if the change makes sense for the 32 bit emulation path as well.
> In this case, you should definitely do the same thing to both
> sys_select and compat_sys_select if this is found worthwhile.
> > This patch improves the sys_select() execution when used for delay.
> Please describe what aspect of the syscall is improved. Is this only
> speeding up the execution for the delay case while slowing down
> the normal case, or do the actual semantics improve?

there is something funky about increasing the speed of a delay ;)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-30 20:15    [W:0.063 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site