[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: what's next for the linux kernel?
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:32:35PM -0400, wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:12:38 EDT, Horst von Brand said:
> > > some
> > > operating system primitives, such as message passing (based on a
> > > derivative by thompson of the "alice" project from plessey, imperial and
> > > manchester university in the mid-80s), hardware cache line lookups
> > > (which means instead of linked list searching, the hardware does it for
> > > you in a single cycle), stuff like that.
> >
> > Single CPU cycle for searching data in memory? Impossible.
> Well... if it was content-addressable RAM similar to what's already used for
> the hardware TLB's and the like - just that it's one thing to make a 32 or 256
> location content-addressable RAM, and totally another to have multiple megabytes
> of the stuff. :)

aspex microelectronics 4096 2-bit massively parallel SIMD
processor (does 1 terabit-ops / sec @ 250mhz which sounds a
lot until you try to do FPU emulation on it).

each 2-bit processor has 256 bits of content-addressable memory,
which can be 8-bit, 16-bit or 32-bit addressed (to make 4096 parallel
memory searches - in a single cycle).

absolutely friggin blindingly fast for certain issues (video
processing, certain kinds of audio processing - e.g. FFTs,
XML and HTTP parsing), and pissed all over for others such
as doing floating point arithmetic.

but anyway: that's a side issue. thanks for reminding me about CAM,


<a href=""></a>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-03 21:06    [W:0.154 / U:3.696 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site