[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits

Ingo - I think you broke the sparc defconfig build with this.

I am seeing the sparc defconfig (crosstool) build broken with 2.6.14-rc5-mm1.
It built ok with 2.6.14-rc4-mm1.

This build now fails for me, with:

CC net/ipv4/route.o
In file included from include/linux/mroute.h:129,
from net/ipv4/route.c:89:
include/net/sock.h: In function `sk_dst_get':
include/net/sock.h:972: warning: implicit declaration of function `__raw_read_unlock'
include/net/sock.h: In function `sk_dst_set':
include/net/sock.h:991: warning: implicit declaration of function `__raw_write_unlock'
net/ipv4/route.c: In function `rt_check_expire':
net/ipv4/route.c:663: warning: dereferencing `void *' pointer
net/ipv4/route.c:663: error: request for member `raw_lock' in something not a structure or union
make[2]: *** [net/ipv4/route.o] Error 1

Your patch added:

> +++ linux/include/linux/spinlock.h
> ...
> +# define write_unlock_irq(lock) \
> + do { __raw_write_unlock(&(lock)->raw_lock); local_irq_enable(); } while (0)

I see __raw_write_unlock defined in include/asm-sparc/spinlock.h, which
is not included in defconfig sparc builds because such builds are non-
debug UP builds.

I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <> 1.925.600.0401
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-27 18:58    [W:0.031 / U:1.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site