[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA
On Thursday 27 October 2005 10:25, Magnus Damm wrote:
> But if the same logic is applied to the NUMA code, why then is there
> both k8topology.c and srat.c? Does non-ACPI systems exist in x86_64
> land?

Historical reasons. The first AMD NUMA systems indeed didn't have SRAT
and before ACPI 3.0 was released there were some concerns about the
Microsoft license of SRAT. So k8topology was implemented as a stopgap.
The long term plan is to get rid of it though once the ACPI code has been
proven completely stable.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-27 10:34    [W:0.027 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site