[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [discuss] [rfc] x86_64: Kconfig changes for NUMA
On 10/27/05, Andi Kleen <> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2005 08:25, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > > While at it, could you please consider to remove the SMP dependency
> > > from NUMA_EMU? 2.6.14-rc5-git5 builds and works with !SMP and
> No.

That was quick.

> > > NUMA_EMU.
> > >
> > > Why?
> > > 1. No need to force SMP when not needed.
> > > 2. qemu-system-x86_64 does not currently work with SMP kernels.
> qemu needs to be fixed then.

Yep. Any day soon now (tm).

> > Update:
> >
> > Both CONFIG_NUMA_EMU and CONFIG_K8_NUMA build and run just fine
> > without CONFIG_SMP. Not sure about CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA though.
> I don't want too many weird combinations which no normal person uses like
> this. Undoubtedly there will be compile breakage for such stuff in the future
> (even if it happens to work by chance now) and best is to not open this can
> of worms in the first place. The number of variants has to be kept under
> control.

Yes, I understand that keeping the combinations low is a good thing.

But if the same logic is applied to the NUMA code, why then is there
both k8topology.c and srat.c? Does non-ACPI systems exist in x86_64


/ magnus
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-27 10:29    [W:0.023 / U:0.856 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site