Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:04:35 +0800 | From | Luke Yang <> | Subject | Re: The "best" value of HZ |
| |
yes, our Blackfin CPU (from Analog Device) is team interested in it. Dynamically modify HZ will be useful when we evaluate the performance.
On 10/28/05, Claudio Scordino <cloud.of.andor@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > during the last years there has been a lot of discussion about the "best" > value of HZ... On i386 was 100, then became 1000, and finally was set to 250. > I'm thinking to do an evaluation of this parameter using different > architectures. > > Has anybody thought to give the possibility to modify the value of HZ at boot > time instead of at compile time ? This would allow to easily test different > values on different machines and create a table containing the "best" value > for each architecture... At this moment, instead, we have to recompile the > kernel for each different value :( > > Do you think there would be much work to do that ? > Do you think it would be a desired feature the knowledge of the best value for > each architecture with more precision ? > > Thanks, > > Claudio > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |