Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:43:05 +1000 | From | Peter Williams <> | Subject | Re: [BUG] 2.6.14-rc5-mm1 build fails for non SMP systems |
| |
Peter Williams wrote: > Without CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK configured in I'm getting a large number > of "implicit declaration of function ‘__raw_read_unlock’" warnings and a > subsequent failure at the link stage. > > A trivial change to include/linux/spinlock_up.h (i.e. moving the > definition of __raw_read_unlock() outside the ifdef) can get rid of this > warning but I'm not sure that it's the right thing to do as I suspect > this may be an indication of a less trivial problem elsewhere.
Further investigation reveals a number of similar warnings for __raw_write_unlock() and the following failure in the ipv4 code:
In file included from /home/peterw/wrk/PlugSched/MM-2.6.14/include/linux/mroute.h:130, from /home/peterw/wrk/PlugSched/MM-2.6.14/net/ipv4/route.c:90: /home/peterw/wrk/PlugSched/MM-2.6.14/include/net/sock.h: In function ‘sk_dst_get’: /home/peterw/wrk/PlugSched/MM-2.6.14/include/net/sock.h:972: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘__raw_read_unlock’ /home/peterw/wrk/PlugSched/MM-2.6.14/include/net/sock.h: In function ‘sk_dst_set’: /home/peterw/wrk/PlugSched/MM-2.6.14/include/net/sock.h:991: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘__raw_write_unlock’ /home/peterw/wrk/PlugSched/MM-2.6.14/net/ipv4/route.c: In function ‘rt_check_expire’: /home/peterw/wrk/PlugSched/MM-2.6.14/net/ipv4/route.c:663: warning: dereferencing ‘void *’ pointer /home/peterw/wrk/PlugSched/MM-2.6.14/net/ipv4/route.c:663: error: request for member ‘raw_lock’ in something not a structure or union make[3]: *** [net/ipv4/route.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [net/ipv4] Error 2 make[1]: *** [net] Error 2 make: *** [_all] Error 2
Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |