Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:59:27 +0900 | From | Kamezawa Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface |
| |
Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > >>>>How about this ? >>>>+cpuset_update_task_mems_allowed(task, new); (this isn't implemented >>>>now >> >>*new* is already guaranteed to be the subset of current mem_allowed. >>Is this violate the permission ? > > > Could the cpuset_mems_allowed(task) function update the mems_allowed if > needed? It looks I was wrong :( see Paul's e-mail. he describes the problem of my suggestion in detail.
-- Kame
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |