Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:41:53 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5 |
| |
* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > the moment you express yourself via patches we'll know that 1) you > > understand what we have done so far 2) you have useful ideas of what > > should be done differently 3) you have the coder capability to implement > > and test those ideas. Patches wont be ignored, i can assure you. Get the > > patches rolling! > > This "shut up and show code" attitude is sometimes quite funny, but > it's no real threat to me. I hoped to avoid this and solve this more > civilized. Of course I'll understand the issues better afterwards, but > you could as easily just tell me. [...]
if a dozen mails werent enough then one more probably wont make a difference, especially with your last mail calling Thomas's behavior "childish" - when all he did was to try to explain his reasons to you as patiently as possible! Thomas is not obliged to teach you or bear with you - it is his own free choice. (But if you want to discuss this personal angle any further please take the public lists (and other people) off the Cc: list, it's getting very off-topic.)
Thomas's stuff is now fully integrated into the -rt tree and it works excellently. I have measured a 12 usecs worst-case HR timer-delivery latency (using cyclictest). _That_ is the thing i care about.
> [...] It will waste my time, I could spend on other projects and it > will put Andrew in the unfortunate position to decide, which patch to > accept. [...]
yes, please, put Andrew (and me too) into that unfortunate position! Please, pretty please, get on with the patches!
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |