lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5

* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

> > > Just for the record: in this thread I got exactly three answers
> > > from Thomas. I don't know where you got the other nine mails from,
> > > maybe you could forward them to me, as they seem to contain the
> > > "patient explanations" I'm missing.
> > >
> > here are all the replies from Thomas, regarding ktimers:
> >
> > 12359 * Sep 22 Thomas Gleixner ( 319) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
> > 12362 * Sep 23 Thomas Gleixner ( 49) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
> > 12363 * Sep 23 Thomas Gleixner ( 235) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
> > 12367 * Sep 24 Thomas Gleixner ( 214) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
> > 12368 * Sep 25 Thomas Gleixner ( 25) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
> > 12369 * Sep 25 Thomas Gleixner ( 17) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
> > 12370 * Sep 25 Thomas Gleixner ( 10) Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem
>
> Different thread and not directly related to issues with the patch.

ugh, what were they about then, poetry?

Ah i think i know what you mean: these were about a PREVIOUS VERSION of
the patch, and hence they fell off the face of the earth, regardless of
their content, right? What a tricky little definition of "Thomas replied
only 3 times" ...

> > 12387 * Oct 01 Thomas Gleixner ( 817) Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc
> > 12419 * Oct 11 Thomas Gleixner ( 41) Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc
> > 12434 * Oct 16 Thomas Gleixner ( 40) Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc
>
> That's the only mails related to the patch.

your latest mail with the list of 'open' issues seems to contradict your
assertion that the above 3 mails from Thomas where "the only mails
related to the patch". E.g.:

' - "timer API" vs "timeout API": I got absolutely no acknowlegement
that this might be a little confusing and in consequence "process
timer" may be a better name. '

was raised and discussed in the first chunk of mails just as well.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-17 19:38    [W:0.094 / U:1.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site