Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:10:15 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] miss-sync changes on attributes (Re: [PATCH 2/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount (miss-sync on utime)) |
| |
"Machida, Hiroyuki" <machida@sm.sony.co.jp> wrote: > > > > OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > > Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes: > > > > > >>However there's not much point in writing a brand-new function when > >>write_inode_now() almost does the right thing. We can share the > >>implementation within fs-writeback.c. > > > > > > Indeed. We use the generic_osync_inode() for it? > > Please let me confirm. > Using generic_osync_inode(inode, NULL, OSYNC_INODE) instaed of > sync_inode_wodata(inode) is peferable for changes on fs/open.c, > even it would write data. Is it correct? >
I don't know. It depends on what you're actually trying to do, and I don't recall anyone having described that! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |