lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: "stable" vs "security stable"
Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
> On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said:
>>
>>>On 10/9/05, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on.
>>>"Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related.
>>
>>Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it..
>>
>
>
> Better be "stable" and "base". 2.6.13.3 is the latest stable, 2.6.13
> is the latest base.

I think the idea of having the most recent "base release," and -stable,
and -rc, and -git, are desirable, with some clear terms. Those of us who
started with ftp and never felt the need for using a GUI have long since
learned what to keep and where to find it, but I bet most people use the
web by now.

--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-10 18:15    [W:0.331 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site