Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Why no XML in the Kernel? | | Date | Sun, 09 Oct 2005 12:38:15 -0300 | | From | Horst von Brand <> |
| |
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> wrote:
[...]
> it's a friggin sight better than contemplating XML, but it also comes > with a price tag: in this case, nearly 70,000 lines of library code > that "encapsulates" and "extracts" the data structures for you, at > runtime [yes, you can supply your own malloc and free routines]
70 KSLOC is a /lot/, the benefit of having that in kernel would have to be very large to justify it. And in the frame of an operating system that believes in flat ("just stream of bytes") interfaces throughout and hopefully very simple tools on top ("cat", "more", "grep") that are combined by the user to do complex stuff I just don't see it. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |