Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:12:16 +0400 | From | "Vladimir B. Savkin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs |
| |
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:03:24AM -0700, john stultz wrote: > >From your dmesg, it appears that there are no other timesources other > then the TSC available on your hardware. So I'm guessing idle=poll is > keeping the CPUs from halting the TSC and keeping them synched. > > > I would think that the ACPI PM timer would be supported, but I don't see > anything about it in your dmesg. Could you make sure it is properly > configured in?
Yes, I tried different combinations of PM_TIMER and HPET options. In this try, PM_TIMER was definetly enabled in kernel config.
What kind of kernel message did you expect from workibf PM timer?
~ :wq With best regards, Vladimir Savkin.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |