[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fs: Restore files_lock and set_fs_root exports
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 16:24 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Iau, 2005-01-06 at 23:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > I think the exports should be restored. So does Linus ("Not that I like it
> > > all that much, but I don't think we should break existing modules unless we
> > > have a very specific reason to break just those modules.").
> >
> > What happens when the feature is just not (ab)usable in the way proposed ?
> At that point there is a specific _reason_ to break it, aka "that function
> simply doesn't exist any more".

how about "it can be static, and static functions without external
references can be better optimized by gcc (and are, as of version 3.4)"
(where function pointers are seen as external references, and
EXPORT_SYMBOL does just that)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.363 / U:1.480 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site