Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:42:52 +0900 (JST) | Subject | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? | From | Yasuyuki KOZAKAI <> |
| |
Hi,
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:16:36 +0900 (JST)
> In article <41FDBB78.2050403@trash.net> (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 06:00:40 +0100), Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> says: > > |We don't need this for IPv6 yet. Once we get nf_conntrack in we > |might need this, but its IPv6 fragment handling is different from > |ip_conntrack, I need to check first. > > Ok. It would be better to have some comment but anyway... > kozakai-san?
IMO, fix for nf_conntrack isn't needed yet. Because someone may change IPv6 fragment handling in nf_conntrack.
Anyway, current nf_conntrack passes the original (not de-fragmented) skb to IPv6 stack. nf_conntrack doesn't touch its dst.
Regards, ---------------------------------------- Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
Communication Platform Laboratory, Corporate Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corporation
yasuyuki.kozakai@toshiba.co.jp ---------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |