Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:37:58 -0800 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: starting with 2.7 |
| |
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:20:40AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: >> 2.2 before 2.2.20 also had this kind of problem, as did >> the 2.4 kernel before 2.4.20 or thereabouts. >> I'm pretty sure 2.6 is actually doing better than the >> early 2.0, 2.2 and 2.4 kernels...
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 04:29:53PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > My personal impression was that even the 2.6.0-test kernels were much > better than the 2.4.0-test kernels. > But 2.6.20 will most likely still have the stability of the early > 2.6 kernels instead of a greatly increased stability as observed in > 2.2.20 and 2.4.20 .
This is speculation; there is no reason not to expect the process to converge to as great of stability or greater stability than the 2.4-style process. I specuate that it will in fact do precisely that.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |