[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: starting with 2.7
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Horst von Brand wrote:

> "Theodore Ts'o" <> said:
> [...]
> > The real key, as always, is getting users to download and test a
> > release. So another approach might be to shorten the time between
> > 2.6.x and 2.6.x+1 releases, so as to recreate more testing points,
> > without training people to wait for -bk1, -bk2, -rc1, etc. before
> > trying out the kernel code. This is the model that we used with the
> > 2.3.x series, where the time between releases was often quite short.
> > That worked fairly well, but we stopped doing it when the introduction
> > of BitKeeper eliminated the developer synch-up problem. But perhaps
> > we've gone too far between 2.6.x releases, and should shorten the time
> > in order to force more testing.
> Is there any estimate of the number of daily-straight-from-BK users? I'm
> one, haven't seen any trouble (thus silent up to here).

I'm another. Every morning when I turn on my machine I grab the latest
-bk, build it with my usual config, install that kernel and reboot, then
use that as my "kernel of the day". I do this on both my home and work
box (well, the work box only does this on mondays) and I've had very
little trouble so far.

Jesper Juhl

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.224 / U:2.212 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site