Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:55:49 +0000 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: Patch 4/6 randomize the stack pointer |
| |
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:49:05PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: > > The ideas in IBM's ProPolice changes are good and worth > > implementing, but the current implementation is bad. > > > > Lies. I've read the paper on the current implementation, it's > definitely good. It only operates on C/C++ code though, but that's the > scope of it.
Yeah, I guess your extensive compiler internals experience and knowledge of gcc internals weights a lot more than the opinion of the gcc team..
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |