Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Torokhov <> | Subject | Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] drivers/acpi/: possible cleanups | Date | Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:30:35 -0500 |
| |
On Thursday 27 January 2005 18:04, Len Brown wrote: > Thanks for the patch Adrian. > > I agree that this is the right direction to go -- enforcing APIs with > the use of static reduces the possibility of programming errors -- > particularly with many cooks in the kitchen. Indeed, just on Monday we > discussed a patch from Alexey Starikovskiy to do the same thing. > > The problem is one of logistics. > As I've described before, the files with "R. Byron Moore" at the top are > dual-licensed so Intel can distribute the core interpreter both as GPL > to Linux and also to FreeBSD, HP-UX etc
Well, I can not speak for Adrian but if I were to submit a patch and state that it is also dual licensed you should have no troubles applying it even to the core files, right?
-- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |