[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC: 2.6 patch] drivers/acpi/: possible cleanups
    On Thursday 27 January 2005 18:04, Len Brown wrote:
    > Thanks for the patch Adrian.
    > I agree that this is the right direction to go -- enforcing APIs with
    > the use of static reduces the possibility of programming errors --
    > particularly with many cooks in the kitchen.  Indeed, just on Monday we
    > discussed a patch from Alexey Starikovskiy to do the same thing.
    > The problem is one of logistics.
    > As I've described before, the files with "R. Byron Moore" at the top are
    > dual-licensed so Intel can distribute the core interpreter both as GPL
    > to Linux and also to FreeBSD, HP-UX etc

    Well, I can not speak for Adrian but if I were to submit a patch and state
    that it is also dual licensed you should have no troubles applying it even
    to the core files, right?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.020 / U:92.128 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site