[lkml]   [2005]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC: 2.6 patch] drivers/acpi/: possible cleanups
On Thursday 27 January 2005 18:04, Len Brown wrote:
> Thanks for the patch Adrian.
> I agree that this is the right direction to go -- enforcing APIs with
> the use of static reduces the possibility of programming errors --
> particularly with many cooks in the kitchen.  Indeed, just on Monday we
> discussed a patch from Alexey Starikovskiy to do the same thing.
> The problem is one of logistics.
> As I've described before, the files with "R. Byron Moore" at the top are
> dual-licensed so Intel can distribute the core interpreter both as GPL
> to Linux and also to FreeBSD, HP-UX etc

Well, I can not speak for Adrian but if I were to submit a patch and state
that it is also dual licensed you should have no troubles applying it even
to the core files, right?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09    [W:0.043 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site